The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity
Cats: Music Business|
It never ceases to amaze me the intelligence and great ability, to cut through bullshit and break things down to simple terms, that Bruce Houghton of Hypebot consistently offers on his awesome music industry blog Hypebot. Here is an excerpt from a piece, in response to the newest wave of anti-piracy warriors Lily Allen, James Blunt, Muse, and Elton John that Bruce posted today on Hypebot:
Negativity Comes With A Cost
Artists – particularly rich and successful ones – and business people whose motivation is by definition profit, that complain about lost revenue, will never win the hearts and minds of an audience whose connection with music is primarily an emotional one. Rapidly declining sales have proven that this approach does not work.
The Power Of Positive
Instead of telling fans what they can’t or shouldn’t do, the conversation must shift to sharing with fans the new frontier of music discovery and enjoyment.
Help me spread this message throughout the blogosphere and the music industry. Its innovation we need to fix the industry. Nothing promotes innovation more than tearing down walls and monopolies like those referred to in Artists Are Not Inherently Entitled to Monetary Compensation For Their Art.
Tighter copyright constricts innovation. Smart people in the music business are coming up with amazing ways to monetize music through Direct-to-Fan models. This puts the artist in the drivers seat, for once and for all.
Get the Full Story at Hypebot
Related Posts:
Is Lilly Allen a Pirate Too?
Print This Post
9 Responses to “The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity”
Leave a Comment
Additional comments powered by BackType










September 23rd, 2009 at 11:41 am
The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity http://bit.ly/1EuTVF (My thoughts on todays @hypebot post – Well done Bruce)
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
September 23rd, 2009 at 1:37 pm
RT @JamesPew: The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity http://bit.ly/1EuTVF (My thoughts on todays @hypebot post – Well done Bruce)
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
September 23rd, 2009 at 1:37 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by James Pew. James Pew said: The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity http://bit.ly/1EuTVF (My thoughts on todays @hypebot post – Well done Bruce) [...]
September 23rd, 2009 at 1:48 pm
The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity http://ff.im/-8B8sU
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
September 23rd, 2009 at 1:59 pm
The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity http://bit.ly/1EuTVF
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
September 23rd, 2009 at 2:17 pm
RT @shawndaley: The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity http://bit.ly/1EuTVF #musicbiz
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
September 24th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity http://bit.ly/1EuTVF (My thoughts on todays @hypebot post – Well done Bruce) RT@JamesPew
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
September 25th, 2009 at 9:40 am
[...] in, or interested in, the music industry. This week Bruce published an important piece called The Music Industry Pays The Price Of Negativity (click through the link to read my thoughts and an excerpt of Bruce’s [...]
September 25th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Performance royalties for downloads? Ridiculous. It’s hard not to see how this wouldn’t completely screw anyone who sells digital music online.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but it seems as if it would also apply to musicians selling on a personal website or CD Baby, TuneCore, etc. Wouldn’t one have to pay royalties for sales/streams of your own music, only to receive 80-90% of it back as a royalty payment many months later? Why would I want to stay with (or join) ASCAP/BMI?
This comment was originally posted on hypebot